Postmortem: Volume 01 – Part 01: I want to crush (on) you

  1. Introduction
  2. What went right
  3. What went wrong
  4. Conclusion

The longest part so far for Robomeks has ended. Eight months. 102 pages. How has it turned out to be?

In this post I’ll try to dissect part 01 and pinpoint its best and worst aspects. Because there’s no way to really know what works and what doesn’t, each point is based on the success when trying to achieve my personal goals in that particular aspect and, to a lesser extent, on readers’ feedback. In the conclusion I’ll deal with the possible solutions and what to expect in the following pages of Robomeks.

postmortem_part02_header

Due to its length, I’ve decided to separate this post in several pages. It would have been kilometric otherwise. That also means that there’s little chance that very few of you get to read the whole thing. So, read it or not, you can use this post to comment below on what do you think about the recently published part 01 (I gotta crush (on) you). I’m interested to know about what worked for you and what didn’t, which areas do you think are OK and which ones need improvement, what’s your favourite character so far… and any other thing you may come out with.

Any feedback on this topic will be much appreciated.

Page :« 1 2 3 4 View All »

4 Comments

I don’t know how long I’ve been reading Robomeks, but it’s been a few months at least. So far, I’ve really enjoyed it! Normally, I wouldn’t comment, but I thought I’d like to let you know that I think it’s been great so far.

As for the problems you identified, I think this went very well. Personally, I don’t mind the length, but you certainly do have a point. As for foreshadowing, I read for enjoyment, not to analyze something. So, quite often, foreshadowing will be lost on me. However, I realize there are people who love that stuff, so by all means, please continue. I’m only mentioning it, because, for me, I don’t consider it a detriment to the comic.

As for the rest of it, it went well, for me. Occasionally, there are “hiccups” in the English translation/version, but overall, it’s really good. Considering the amount of text/language you’re dealing with, you’re doing really well. English is my first, and only language (excluding Gibberish, but that doesn’t count), so I *really* appreciate that you publish this comic in English.

Great job overall. I look forward to your continued work. Mouser X over and out.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0


Thanks for your comment, Mouser X. I’m also more a stalker than a commenter myself, so I appreciate it.

I’m glad that this part worked in general for you. Sometimes is difficult to know when you’re in the good track or not, so any feedback is always helpful.

About the language, well, there’s not too many options if you want to reach your audience, particularly when talking about sci-fi, with this particular art style, etc. When all the matryoshka dolls are opened, the potential audience that is left is niche at best. Going international, and therefore, publishing it in English, was the only way. Fortunately, this wasn’t only a “forced” decision, but a personal wish. So, there’s nothing to thank. I would publish Robomeks in English even if none of the above were true, as I’m enjoying the challenge :)

Thanks again and I hope you keep enjoying Robomeks.


I just finished reading your web comic for the first time, and I really do enjoy what I see. I also went over your Postmortem and think that you have done a great job of of contructively analyzing your work. I’m sure you get plenty of feedback, but I really like where you are going with this story and wanted to help!

The only thing I had problems with (that you didn’t cover in your postmortem) is with some of the pages where the panels are uneven. I really like the look, but some times I wasn’t sure how to follow the action. Do I read across and then down, or down and then across? It would be helpful for the reader to have a clearer idea of the sequence of panels.

You also mentioned the problems with forshadowing. Might I suggest what I have seen in other web comics: on pages that reference something that was forshadowed in the past, put links to the pages where it was originally forshadowed. This won’t work for everything, especially when the forshadowing is very subdued, but used properly it can work as a reminder to your readers and releave you of some of the burden of having to re-tell everything.

Take care,
Tim

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0


Thanks for your comment and welcome, Tim.

Page layout: That’s a very interesting issue you’ve brought up and, indeed, I probably should have included it. Most of the problematic pages you’ve detected could have been fixed with a more exigent revision process of their storyboard but, unfortunately, I’ve been limited by time restrains too often. I always tried to give hints about the reading pattern, though, but I agree that sometimes those hints were too subtle or simply, not enough. Anyway, I’ll try to be more careful about this from now on. Fortunately, this shouldn’t affect the present part dramatically, as it’s based on the storyboard of the previous page format, which already had a traditional (boring, but easy to follow) storytelling.

Foreshadowing: Yes, I’ve thought about placing a kind of recap text on the pages comment several times. In fact, I did it once. When Edgar mentions to Ace his past attacks, placing in the page comment a couple links to the scenes where Edgar appeared previously. The problem is, as you say, that sometimes this can’t be solved with only a link, and I can’t stop thinking that this is a quick patch at best, as the problem lays in the way foreshadowing is used. But… there’ll be something like this once the new site design is finished. It won’t be presented as you’ve usually seen in other webcomics, though.

And, no, there’s no “plenty of feedback”, it’s been quite scarce in fact. Partially because I’m not actively involved in the “webcomic community” (so I don’t benefit from the usual cross-commenting, etc) and partially because I suspect most Robomeks readers share my own profile (mostly introspective “not-so-young” people). So, any feedback is always welcomed, particularly when it’s as interesting and well constructed (not to mention funny) as it’s been so far :)


Leave a Comment

Your email address isn't required.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>